Research Questions
How can I, as the campus administrator in charge of the campus Response to Intervention (RTI) process, better understand its purpose and pedagogy? And What is the current level of staff understanding of the RTI process and what training is needed to improve its implementation?
Goals and objectives/outcomes of the research investigation
• It is the goal of this study to educate myself on all aspects of the RTI process to better facilitate the implementation at the campus level.
• To understand the current teacher understanding and perception of RTI for the purpose of identifying areas of weakness.
• To develop, facilitate and monitor the effective implementation of RTI in the classroom.
Activities
• Develop a bank of resources that explain the Response to Intervention process and how the process impacts student learning. Within this collection, I will include case studies, laws, court cases, instructional materials and possible implementation methods used by other districts. I will seek information from the district RTI specialist relating to the implementation expectations for the campus and training on the Laser Focus data collection software.
• Distribute RTI teacher survey to gather data on teacher understanding of the RTI process. The survey will include: questions regarding basic understanding as shared through essay format, desired area for trainings, multiple choice options targeted at identifying knowledge of the Tier process and understanding of documentation process.
• Development and implementation of targeted training based on teacher understanding and identified areas of need as gathered from the above survey.
• Classroom observations to verify the implementation of RTI interventions.
• Re-administration of RTI survey.
Resources and research tools needed for data gathering
• Internet search engines and databases for gathering RTI background information.
• Accessing printed materials on RTI
• Access to district RTI specialist and documentation software
• Access to teachers for completion of initial and follow-up surveys
• Scheduled time to conduct training with entire staff
• Scheduled time to conduct walkthrough observations for implementation of RTI interventions
• Access to student CBA data
•
Draft timeline for completion or implementation of activities
August 2010 - Begin research of RTI process and background information.
September 2010 - Distribute teacher survey and analyze results
October 2010 – Collect initial CBA student scores
First training based on above results. (Ex. Background information,
explanation of tiering, or RTI interventions)
November –
March 2010 – Classroom observations
November 2010 – Laser Focus documentation training
December 2010 - Collect CBA scores
Second Training RTI interventions
January 2010 – Third Training RTI interventions
February 2010 - Collect CBA scores
Re-administration of RTI teacher survey
March –
April 2010 – Analysis of data
April 2010 – Summary of findings
Persons responsible for implementation of the action research plan
• I, Jeri Veile, will be responsible for: the research of RTI, creation and implementation of the RTI teacher pre- and post-survey, and data analysis.
• I will work in conjunction with district staff to present training on focus areas.
• All campus administrators will be responsible for collecting data via walkthrough observations.
• Staff will be responsible for implementation of RTI interventions.
Process for monitoring the achievement of goals and objectives
• Pre- and Post-RTI teacher survey will be used to gather initial data and gauge increased understanding at the end of the research.
• Sign-in sheets will be used to document teacher attendance at training
• Classroom Walk-Through reports will be used to collect implementation data
Assessment instrument(s) to evaluate the effectiveness of the action research study
CBA, benchmark, scores will be collected at 6 weeks and used to establish a base-line for student scores. Subsequent CBA scores will be used to monitor progress throughout the year.
Pre- and post-RTI survey results will be used to identify changes in teacher perceived understanding of the process.
Classroom Walk-Through reports will be used to identify change in the frequency of RTI interventions used in the classroom.
Quantitative data in the form of student CBA, benchmark, scores will be used to establish current content mastery and track student success throughout the year. This data will give a snapshot of how students are performing in comparison to their peers. The data will track class performance.
Field notes will be gathered during classroom walkthrough observations collected by all campus administrators. This data will be used to identify interventions being used in individual classrooms and will be collected via Eduphoria software.
Pre- and post-RTI teacher survey information will be administered to all classroom teachers in order to establish an understanding of the teachers’ current knowledge of the RTI process and then compared to the end of the year survey to indicate change.